Alabama Veterans Rural Health Initiative: a pilot study of enhanced community outreach in rural areas

Academic Article


  • © 2013 National Rural Health Association. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide needed empirical support for a specific outreach intervention that speeds enrollment and engagement for rural individuals in VA services. Planned interventions to improve service utilization should ameliorate ambivalence about accessing health care in addition to addressing traditional systems or environmental-level barriers. PURPOSE: Access, enrollment, and engagement with primary and specialty health care services present significant challenges for rural populations worldwide. The Alabama Veterans Rural Health Initiative evaluated an innovative outreach intervention combining motivational interviewing, patient navigation, and health services education to promote utilization of the United States Veterans Administration Healthcare System (VA) by veterans who live in rural locations. METHODS: Community outreach workers completed the intervention and assessment, enrolling veterans from 31 counties in a southern state. A total 203 participants were randomized to either an enhanced enrollment and engagement outreach condition (EEE, n = 101) or an administrative outreach (AO, n = 102) condition. FINDINGS: EEE participants enrolled and attended VA appointments at higher rates and within fewer days than those who received AO. Eighty-seven percent of EEE veterans attended an appointment within 6 months, compared to 58% of AO veterans (P < .0001). The median time to first appointment was 12 days for the EEE group and 98 days for the AO group (P < .0001). Additionally, a race by outreach group interaction emerged: black and white individuals benefited equally from the EEE intervention; however, black individuals who received AO took significantly longer to attend appointments than their white counterparts.
  • Published In

    Digital Object Identifier (doi)

    Pubmed Id

  • 18678701
  • Author List

  • Hilgeman MM; Mahaney-Price AF; Stanton MP; McNeal SF; Pettey KM; Tabb KD; Litaker MS; Parmelee P; Hamner K; Martin MY
  • Start Page

  • 153
  • End Page

  • 163
  • Volume

  • 30
  • Issue

  • 2