Comparison of the BOD POD with the four-compartment model in adult females

Academic Article

Abstract

  • Purpose: This study was designed to compare the accuracy and bias in estimates of total body density (Db) by hydrostatic weighing (HW) and the BOD POD, and percent body fat (%fat) by the BOD POD with the four-compartment model (4C model) in 42 adult females. Furthermore, the role of the aqueous and mineral fractions in the estimation of body fat by the BOD POD was examined. Methods: Total body water was determined by isotope dilution (2H2O) and bone mineral was determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Db and %fat were determined by the BOD POD and HW. The 4C model of Baumgartner was used as the criterion measure of body fat. Results: HW Db (1.0352 g.cm-3) was not statistically different (P = 0.35) from BOD POD Db (1.0349 g.cm-3). The regression between Db by HW and the BOD POD significantly deviated from the line of identity (Db by HW = 0.90 × Db by BOD POD + 0.099; R2 = 0.94). BOD POD %fat (28.8%) was significantly lower (P < 0.01) than %fat by the 4C model (30.6%). The regression between %fat by the 4C model and the BOD POD significantly deviated from the line of identity (%fat by 4C model = 0.88 × %fat by BOD POD + 5.41%; R2 = 0.92). BOD POD Db and %fat showed no bias across the range of fatness. Only the aqueous fraction of the fat-free mass (FFM) had a significant correlation with the difference in %fat between the 4C model and the BOD POD. Conclusion: These data indicate that the BOD POD underpredicted body fat as compared with the 4C model, and the aqueous fraction of the FFM had a significant effect on estimates of %fat by the BOD POD.
  • Authors

    Digital Object Identifier (doi)

    Author List

  • Fields DA; Wilson GD; Gladden LB; Hunter GR; Pascoe DD; Goran MI
  • Start Page

  • 1605
  • End Page

  • 1610
  • Volume

  • 33
  • Issue

  • 9