Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation

Academic Article

Abstract

  • The purpose of this research was to determine whether motor cortex excitability assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is less variable when subjects maintain a visually controlled low-level contraction of the muscle of interest. We also examined the dependence of single motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level using linear and non-linear multiple regression analysis. Eight healthy adult subjects received single pulse TMS over the left motor cortex at a point where minimal stimulation intensity was required to produce MEPs in extensor digitorum communis (EDC). Voluntary activation of the muscle was controlled by visual display of a target force (indicated by a stable line on an oscilloscope) and the isometric force produced as the subject attempted to extend the fingers (indicated by a line on the oscilloscope representing the finger extension force) while subjects were instructed to: exert zero extension force (0%) and produce forces equal to 5 and 10% of maximum voluntary finger extension under separate conditions. Relative variability (coefficient of variation) of single MEPs at a constant stimulus intensity and of pre-stimulus muscle EMG was lower during maintained 5 and 10% contractions than at 0% contraction levels. Therefore, maintaining a stable low intensity contraction helps stabilize cortical and spinal excitability. Multiple regression analyses showed that a linear dependence of single MEPs on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level produced similar fits to those for a non-linear dependence on stimulus intensity and a linear dependence on pre-stimulus EMG. Thus, a simple linear method can be used to assess dependence of single MEP amplitudes on both stimulus intensity (to characterize slope of the recruitment curve) and low intensity background muscle activation level. © Springer-Verlag 2006.
  • Author List

  • Darling WG; Wolf SL; Butler AJ
  • Start Page

  • 376
  • End Page

  • 385
  • Volume

  • 174