Peering into the black box: A meta-analysis of how clinicians use decision aids during clinical encounters

Academic Article

Abstract

  • Objective: To quantify the extent to which clinicians use clinically-efficacious decision aids as intended during implementation in practice and how fidelity to usage instructions correlates with shared decision making (SDM) outcomes. Methods: Participant-level meta-analysis including six practice-based randomized controlled trials of SDM in various clinical settings encompassing a range of decisions.Results: Of 339 encounters in the SDM intervention arm of the trials, 229 were video recorded and available for analysis. The mean proportion of fidelity items observed in each encounter was 58.4% (SD = 23.2). The proportion of fidelity items observed was significantly associated with patient knowledge (p = 0.01) and clinician involvement of the patient in decision making (p <0.0001), while no association was found with patient decisional conflict or satisfaction with the encounter.Conclusion: Clinicians' fidelity to usage instructions of point-of-care decision aids in randomized trials was suboptimal during their initial implementation in practice, which may have underestimated the potential efficacy of decision aids when used as intended. © 2014 Wyatt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
  • Authors

    Published In

    Digital Object Identifier (doi)

    Author List

  • Wyatt KD; Branda ME; Anderson RT; Pencille LJ; Montori VM; Hess EP; Ting HH; LeBlanc A
  • Volume

  • 9
  • Issue

  • 1