Interprofessional Clinical Rounding: Effects on Processes and Outcomes of Care

Academic Article

Abstract

  • Background and Purpose: Communication breakdown is viewed as a significant contributor to preventable patient harm. Interprofessional rounding (IPR) is one method of communication supporting the evidenced-based care delivery. The purpose of this paper is to explore the benefits of IPR for patients, clinicians, and the healthcare system. Review of the Literature: Interprofessional rounding supports collaboration, discussion, and timely intervention to prevent miscommunication leading to adverse patient events. Adherence to evidence-based care suggests a positive impact on patient, process, and financial outcomes. Statistically significant IPR-related improvements are seen in reducing mortality, lengths of stay, medication errors, and hospitalization costs as well as improved staff and patient satisfaction. Evidence-Based Strategies: One IPR-related gap in the literature is integrative care delivery, a strategy that provides a unified plan to meet the complex needs of patients and produce optimal outcomes. Activation and standardization with active participation in IPR support a collaborative integration of care. Conclusion and Implications: Embracing IPR and advocating for collaboration across the care continuum is a crucial process in preventing adverse events. Integrated care delivery through IPR provides a unified plan to meet the complex needs of patients, prevent harm, and produce best possible outcomes.
  • Published In

    Digital Object Identifier (doi)

    Author List

  • Ashcraft S; Bordelon C; Fells S; George V; Thombley K; Shirey MR
  • Start Page

  • 85
  • End Page

  • 94
  • Volume

  • 39
  • Issue

  • 2