The authors regret that on page 119, line 34–36 of this manuscript, there was an error. It should read: There were statistically significant group differences in head motion estimates in a few dimensions at an uncorrected threshold (See Supplementary Table 2. Please ignore the Supplementary Table 2 in the published paper. The correct Supplementary Table is presented below). Such differences in head motion may have impacted our functional connectivity results. Therefore, the functional connectivity results of our study should be interpreted with caution. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.