OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis A vaccination is recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Our aim was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of hepatitis A vaccination in these patients. The specific strategies evaluated were: no vaccination, targeted vaccination, and universal vaccination. METHODS: Clinical estimates were based on published data. Costs estimates were based on published data and institutional Medicare reimbursement rates. Health-related quality-of-life weights were derived from published data and expert estimates. The target population consisted of patients 45 yr of age with chronic hepatitis C followed every 6 months until death. We adopted a societal perspective. RESULTS: Compared with no vaccination, targeted vaccination was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $51,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of universal vaccination compared with targeted vaccination was $3,900,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. The results were particularly sensitive to the incidence of hepatitis A, probability of fulminant hepatic failure, and costs of hepatitis A antibody screening and vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted vaccination for hepatitis A in patients with chronic hepatitis C may be a cost-effective strategy to decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with hepatitis A superinfection. Universal vaccination is not a cost-effective alternative to targeted vaccination in this target population.
Aged, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Health Care Costs, Health Services Needs and Demand, Health Status, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis A Vaccines, Hepatitis C, Chronic, Humans, Male, Markov Chains, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, United States, Vaccination