Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: A pooled analysis of studies using the control preferences scale

Academic Article


  • Objectives: To collect normative data, assess differences between demographic groups, and indirectly compare US and Canadian medical systems relative to patient expectations of involvement in cancer treatment decision making. Study Design: Meta-analysis. Methods: Individual patient data were compiled across 6 clinical studies among 3491 patients with cancer who completed the 2-item Control Preferences Scale indicating the roles they preferred versus actually experienced in treatment decision making. Results: The roles in treatment decision making that patients preferred were 26% active, 49% collaborative, and 25% passive. The roles that patients reported actually experiencing were 30% active, 34% collaborative, and 36% passive. Roughly 61% of patients reported having their preferred role; only 6% experienced extreme discordance between their preferred versus actual roles. More men than women (66% vs 60%, P = .001) and more US patients than Canadian patients (84% vs 54%, P < .001) reported concordance between their preferred versus actual roles. More Canadian patients than US patients preferred and actually experienced (42% vs 18%, P < .001) passive roles. More women than men reported taking a passive role (40% vs 24%, P < .001). Older patients preferred and were more likely than younger patients to assume a passive role. Conclusions: Roughly half of the studied patients with cancer indicated that they preferred to have a collaborative relationship with physicians. Although most patients had the decision-making role they preferred, about 40% experienced discordance. This highlights the need for incorporation of individualized patient communication styles into treatment plans.
  • Authors

    Published In

    Author List

  • Singh JA; Sloan JA; Atherton PJ; Smith T; Hack TF; Huschka MM; Rummans TA; Clark MM; Diekmann B; Degner LF
  • Start Page

  • 688
  • End Page

  • 696
  • Volume

  • 16
  • Issue

  • 9