Potential of noninvasive serial assessment of acute renal allograft rejection by18F-FDG PET to monitor treatment efficiency

Academic Article


  • We propose 18F-FDG PET as a method to monitor acute rejection of allogeneic renal transplants in a rat model. Methods: Allogeneically transplanted (aTX) rats (binephrectomized Lewis-brown Norway to Lewis) served as the renal transplant model. aTX rats treated with cyclosporine A (CSA) served as a therapy monitoring group. Healthy control rats, rats with acute CSA nephrotoxicity, rats with acute tubular necrosis, syngeneically transplanted (sTX) rats, and aTX rats treated with CSA since postoperative day 0 served as controls. After surgery, renal glucose metabolism was assessed in vivo serially up to postoperative day 7 by performing small-animal PET 3 h after intravenous injection of 30 MBq of 18F-FDG. Mean radioactivity (cps/mm 3 of tissue) was measured and the percentage injected dose calculated. Results were confirmed by histologic, functional, and autoradiographic analysis. Results: Renal 18F-FDG uptake was significantly elevated at postoperative day 4 in aTX rats, when compared with control, sTX, acute tubular necrosis, or CSA-treated rats (P < 0.05). In vivo 18F-FDG uptake correlated with the results of autoradiography and with inflammatory infiltrates observed on histologic examination. Notably, 18F-FDG PET assessed the response to therapy 48 h earlier than the time at which serum creatinine decreased and when histologic examination still showed signs of allograft rejection. In aTX rats, the CSA-susceptible graft infiltrate was dominated by activated cytotoxic T cells and monocytes/ macrophages. Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET is an option to noninvasively assess early response to therapy in rat renal allograft rejection. Copyright © 2010 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
  • Authors

    Published In

    Digital Object Identifier (doi)

    Author List

  • Reuter S; Schnöckel U; Edemir B; Schröter R; Kentrup D; Pavenstädt H; Schober O; Schlatter E; Gabriëls G; Schäfers M
  • Start Page

  • 1644
  • End Page

  • 1652
  • Volume

  • 51
  • Issue

  • 10