Screening of Hyperlipidemia Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States

Academic Article

Abstract

  • © 2018, American College of Rheumatology Objective: To determine the proportion of primary lipid screening among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and compare it with those among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and patients with neither RA nor DM, and to assess whether primary lipid screening varied according to the health care provider (rheumatologist versus non-rheumatologist). Methods: We analyzed claims data from US private and public health plans from 2006–2010. Eligibility requirements included continuous medical and pharmacy coverage for ≥12 months (baseline period) and >2 physician diagnoses and relevant medications to define RA, DM, RA and DM, or neither condition. Among the 330,695 eligible participants, we calculated the proportion with a lipid profile ordered during the 2 years following baseline. Time-varying Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the probability of hyperlipidemia screening in participants with RA according to provider specialty. Results: More than half of the patients were ages 41–71 years. Among patients with RA (n = 12,182), DM (n = 62,834), RA and DM (n = 1,082), and those who did not have either condition (n = 167,811), the proportion screened for hyperlipidemia was 37%, 60%, 55%, and 41%, respectively. Patients with RA who visited a rheumatologist and a non-rheumatology clinician during follow-up had a 55% (95% confidence interval 1.36–1.78) higher screening probability than those who only visited a rheumatologist. Conclusion: Primary lipid screening was suboptimal among patients with RA. It was also lower for patients with DM and minimally different from the general population. Screening was higher for RA patients who received care from both a rheumatologist and a non-rheumatologist (e.g., primary care physician).
  • Published In

    Digital Object Identifier (doi)

    Author List

  • Navarro-Millán I; Yang S; Chen L; Yun H; Jagpal A; Bartels CM; Fraenkel L; Safford MM; Curtis JR
  • Start Page

  • 1593
  • End Page

  • 1599
  • Volume

  • 71
  • Issue

  • 12