Lumacaftor/ivacaftor treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis heterozygous for F508del-CFTR

Academic Article

Abstract

  • © Copyright 2017 by the American Thoracic Society. Rationale: In a prior study, lumacaftor/ivacaftor treatment (<28 d) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) heterozygous for F508del-CFTR did not improve lung function. Objectives: To evaluate an optimized lumacaftor/ivacaftor dosing regimen with a longer duration in a cohort of patients heterozygous for F508del-CFTR. Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older with a confirmed CF diagnosis and percent predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) of 40 to 90 were randomized to lumacaftor/ivacaftor (400 mg/250 mg every 12 h) or placebo daily for 56 days. Primary outcomes were change in ppFEV1 at Day 56 and safety. Other disease markers were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: Of 126 patients, 119 (94.4%) completed the study. Lumacaftor/ivacaftor was well tolerated, although chest tightness and dyspnea occurred more frequently with active treatment than with placebo (27.4% vs. 14.3% and 14.5% vs. 6.3%, respectively). Mean (SD) ppFEV1 values at baseline were 62.9 (14.3) in the active treatment group and 60.1 (14.0) in the placebo group. Absolute changes in ppFEV1 (least squares mean [SE]) at Day 56 were 20.6 (0.8) percentage points in the active treatment group and 21.2 (0.8) percentage points in the placebo group (P = 0.60). CF respiratory symptom scores in the active treatment group improved by a mean of 5.7 points versus a decrease of 20.8 in the placebo group (P,0.01). No changes in body mass index occurred. Changes from baseline in sweat chloride (least squares mean [SE]) at Day 56 were211.8 (1.3) mmol/L in the active treatment group and 20.8 (1.2) mmol/L in the placebo group (P,0.0001). Conclusions: Sweat chloride and respiratory symptom scores improved with lumacaftor/ivacaftor, though no meaningful benefit was seen in ppFEV1 or body mass index in patients heterozygous for F508del-CFTR.
  • Authors

    Digital Object Identifier (doi)

    Author List

  • Rowe SM; McColley SA; Rietschel E; Li X; Bell SC; Konstan MW; Marigowda G; Waltz D; Boyle MP
  • Start Page

  • 213
  • End Page

  • 219
  • Volume

  • 14
  • Issue

  • 2